
A Plymouth Superior Court judge on Monday, Nov. 9, cleared the way for Lindsay Clancy to be tried again on murder charges in the deaths of her three young children in Duxbury, rejecting her lawyers’ argument that a second trial would violate her constitutional protection against double jeopardy. Clancy has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent.
“Because the Court concludes that there was a manifest need for a mistrial based on the jury’s deadlock,” Judge William F. Sullivan wrote in a 16-page ruling, “a retrial on the murder indictments does not violate Clancy’s right not to be placed in double jeopardy,” USA Today reported. Whether a Lindsay Clancy retrial actually happens is up to Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz, who has not announced a decision. The case returns to court on Nov. 16.
What the judge decided
Sullivan issued three rulings, according to Massachusetts Legal Resources, citing Boston 25 News and WCVB. He denied the defense motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. He refused a defense request for records about the holdout juror, including questionnaires and cellphone data, and for questioning that juror under oath. And he denied, without prejudice, a prosecution request for a gag order limiting what lawyers can say to the media, meaning prosecutors may ask again “if circumstances change.”
Defense lawyers had argued that Sullivan acted too soon in declaring a mistrial on Sept. 4 and should have questioned and possibly removed the holdout juror, citing jury notes saying the juror was not following the law on reasonable doubt, Reuters reported. Prosecutors countered that questioning the holdout could have meant the judge improperly interfering with deliberations.
Sullivan agreed with that concern. “The Court’s primary concern must be protecting the fairness of the proceedings and avoiding the possibility of a coerced verdict,” he wrote, according to the Massachusetts Legal Resources summary. He also wrote that granting the cellphone request without a proper basis would be “an improper intrusion into this juror’s privacy.” That reasoning tracks the Supreme Judicial Court’s 2025 decision in the Karen Read case, which called a hung jury “a traditional example” of manifest necessity.
How the first trial ended
At the first trial, no one disputed that Clancy strangled her daughter Cora, 5, and sons Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, with exercise bands on Jan. 24, 2023, in the basement of the family’s Duxbury home, Reuters reported. She then cut herself and jumped from a second-story window, leaving her paralyzed. Her lawyers argued she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible, Massachusetts’ version of the insanity defense.
The 26-day trial included 90 witnesses and about 300 exhibits, and jurors deliberated about 27 hours over four days before the deadlock, according to the Boston 25 account of the ruling. WCVB reported an 11-1 split in favor of acquittal. Several jurors later said in televised interviews that, except for one holdout, they were prepared to find Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, which would have meant commitment to a state psychiatric hospital. The holdout later said in a statement through his attorney that he “didn’t have any doubts” about her guilt, USA Today reported. A first-degree murder conviction in Massachusetts carries a mandatory life sentence without parole.
What happens next
Sullivan has suggested a second trial could take place in March, Reuters reported, but no date has been set. Asked last week whether the state planned to retry Clancy, Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague said, “We’re not at that point yet,” WCVB reported. Cruz has said he would talk more about the path forward after the Nov. 16 hearing.
The ruling comes as another high-profile Massachusetts murder jury drew scrutiny: earlier this month, the jury in the Birchmore case began deliberating in the Matthew Farwell trial. Follow more courts and public safety coverage in our Boston news section.
If you or someone you know is struggling after childbirth, the National Maternal Mental Health Hotline is available 24/7 at 1-833-TLC-MAMA (1-833-852-6262).
Sources
- The Guardian (Reuters): Judge clears way for Lindsay Clancy to be retried on murder charges
- USA Today: Lindsay Clancy can be retried for murder, judge rules
- Massachusetts Legal Resources: Lindsay Clancy loses double jeopardy bid
- HRSA Maternal and Child Health Bureau: National Maternal Mental Health Hotline (1-833-TLC-MAMA)
Read next in Crime & Law
Crime & LawCambridge Unveils Memorial Bench for Slain DPW Worker Xavier Bautista as ShotSpotter’s Future Goes to Residents
Crime & LawEverett Police Arrest Man After Rifle Is Fired During Soccer Game Dispute
Crime & LawSupreme Court Lets Trump Resume Border Wall Construction in Texas’s Big Bend, Over Jackson’s Dissent
Most read this week
- Abdul El-Sayed and the Muslim Brotherhood Claims: What’s Confirmed and What Isn’t
- Stock Futures Erase a 2.4% Overnight Drop as Markets Digest Democrats’ Sweep of Congress
- Spain Transport Minister Óscar Puente Quits 26 Days Before Election Over Crash That Killed 69
- Boston Plans to Close 3 Schools in 2028 as Enrollment Drops as Much as 58%
- GM Korea’s Sales Jump 26.6% on Chevrolet Exports as Hyundai Slips 6.3% and Korean Factory Growth Cools
Latest
- Gaza-Born Writer Ahmed Moor Files to Challenge Sen. John Fetterman in Pennsylvania’s 2028 Primary
- Massie Files 8 Impeachment Articles Against Hegseth, Forcing a House Vote Within Two Days
- Permitting Overhaul Clears the Senate’s First Hurdle 73-25 as 21 Democrats Join Republicans
- Boston Would Exempt 7- to 9-Unit Projects From Affordable Housing Rules Under Wu’s New Plan
- Disney and Adobe Will Build Private AI Models Trained on Disney Characters for Parks, Studios and ESPN
